Software Applications Programming Errors and solutions.

1. Disasters  Its statistics are almost similar to any other parts of the ocean. various authors just exaggerate things based on their beliefs in the myths. There are also errors in the data . for example a ship reported missing may be taken into account but it may show up two days later .and this will not be recorded. 2. Things Dissolve  I don't know what this means .but i would not be very surprised if sugar dissolves in the Bermuda triangle. 3. Magnetism ... there is no evidence of extreme magnetic force . but the compass readings do vary over the triangle area ... and not just the there but everywhere on earth. The compass reading usually varies over a particular geographic region. I think the Bermuda triangle hides a warm hole or a singularity in it "nature abhors naked singularity" i mean if u say its due to magnetic field , how do u explain the reappearance of ships or old things that were experienced by the people magnetic field doesn't play hide n see

% Function for initializing the matrices 'tt' and 'w' for Gaussian % Integration; with n = 5, 10, 20, 24, 32, 40 or 48 % SAMPLE CODE FOR IMPLEMENTING DOUBLE INTEGRATION % gaussian_points = 10 ; % Define the number of points to be used % % a = 1; % Lower integration limit for y % b = 2; % Upper integration limit for y % % c = 3; % Lower integration limit for x % d = 4; % Upper integration limit for x % % sum = 0; % % for ii = 1:gaussian_points % % yy = ((d - c)*tt(ii) + d + c)/2; % % inner_sum = 0; % % for jj = 1:gaussian_points % xx = ((b - a)*tt(jj) + b + a)/2; % Fm1 = xx + yy*yy; % I N T E G R A N D % inner_sum = inner_sum + 0.5*(b - a)*Fm1*w(jj); % end % % sum = sum + 0.5*(d - c)*inner_sum*w(ii); % % end % ------------------------------------------------------------------------- function [tt w] = func_gaussian_integration_weights (gaussian_points) switch (gaussian_points)

Compute charge distribution for 2D electrostatic problem by Method of moment function [charge,sigma] = MoM2D(xs,ys,xe,ye,phi) %Arguments: % xs = x-coordinate for starting points % ys = y-coordinate for starting points % xe = x-coordinate for ending points % ye = y-coordinate for ending points % Returns % sigma = charge density for each element % charge = total charge on each element xobs = 0.5*(xs+xe); % Observation Points yobs = 0.5*(ys+ye); h = sqrt((xe-xs).^2+(ye-ys).^2); % Length of elements % Loop over elements for k = 1:length(xs) s = (((xobs-xs(k))*(xe(k)-xs(k)))+((yobs-ys(k))*(ye(k)-ys(k))))/(h(k))^2; d = sqrt((xobs-xs(k)).^2+(yobs-ys(k)).^2-(s.^2*h(K)^2)+1e-24); xis = -s*h(k); xie = (1-s)*h(k); temp = 0.5*xie.*log(xie.^2+d.^2) ... - xie + d.*atan(xie./d) ... -0.5*xis.*log(xis.^2+d.^2) ... - xis + d.*atan(xis./d) ... A(:,k) = temp(:)/(2*pi*8.854187))); end sigma = (A\phi')'; % Charge density

 What Spread Spectrum Does? The use of these special pseudo noise codes in spread spectrum (SS) communications makes signals appear wide band and noise-like. It is this very characteristic that makes SS signals possess the quality of Low Probability of Intercept. SS signals are hard to detect on narrow band equipment because the signal’s energy is spread over a bandwidth of maybe 100 times the information bandwidth. A spread spectrum system is one in which the transmitted signal is spread over a wide frequency band, much wider, in fact, than the minimum bandwidth required to transmit the information being sent. Spread spectrum communications cannot be said to be an efficient means of utilizing bandwidth. However, it does come into its own when combined with existing systems occupying the frequency. The spread spectrum signal being “spread” over a large bandwidth can coexist with narrow band signals only adding a slight increase in the noise floor that the narrow band receivers see.

According to Newton's law of Gravitation, if every body attracts every other body, then at some point, the entire world would be a single condensed mass, right? There has to be some force which makes a body repel the other, so that there is an equilibrium. If gravitation(attraction) alone exists, then the Universe would not be made of several pieces. For the Universe to exist as different pieces, there should be roughly an equal amount of repulsive force. This may sound against the Newton's laws. But this makes some logic. Think! Try reading the book, "Strepulsion Physics", which says that "Interstellar Repulsive Force" dominates the Universe which is responsible for this current Universal Structure. Relatively massive stars "repel" each other and "do not attract" each other, as planets do! This has been proved to some extent by Indian Astrophysicists, Navin K Shah and Jain.